Code center > Bugs and fixes
Why aren't you using 2.42?
Testlund:
How about DarwinBots 2006 Plus?
Numsgil:
Like the new Battlestar galactica we could just confuse the heck out of everyone and call it:
Darwinbots
--- Quote from: shvarz ---My favorite neo-darwinist is probably Theodore Dobzhansky. How about calling the program DobzhanskyBots?
--- End quote ---
Now that's catchy.
We could call it:
LimarckianBots
PurpleYouko:
--- Quote ---Now that's catchy.
We could call it:
LimarckianBots
--- End quote ---
Except that we would then have to pre-select the traits that we want to select for
on another subject, doncha just love the way that this new forum software combines your posts tother when you post twice in a row?
Numsgil:
Yeah, it's real nifty.
Elite:
Erm ...
We should have some sort of notice to newbies on advice as to which version to install, which versions are in progress, possible stability issues etc.
One of the times I first care across DB I installed 2.4.A, thinking that a newer version would be better more stable. Of course, it was disorientating and full of bugs (especially bugs in viruses, which I happened to be dabbling in at the time) and I threw it into the recycle bin. I later realised my mistake and installed 2.37.6 and found it much easier to use as a total newbie.
I don't have anything against 2.4 but I think we should inform newcomers of the issues. 2.37.6 might be easier to begin on? Also, one newcomer was trying to make a tiefeeder, and ties are notoriously unstable in 2.4.
We should really have some sort of a notice to avoid confusion.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version