Code center > Bugs and fixes
Why aren't you using 2.42?
PurpleYouko:
Seriously though, it might not be a bad idea to think about a new type of nomenclature for the C++ version rather than just continuing on with the present number system.
Anyone else have any thoughts?
Numsgil:
I'm open for a new title, but heck if I can think of one.
Elite:
How about:
Darwinbots II 0.5
Darwinbots vC.1.0
Darwinbots C++ v0.5
Or even:
Darwinbots: Now with extra monkey
Testlund:
--- Quote from: PurpleYouko ---Not exactly Testlund. I think you may be misremembering our conversations a little.
As I recall the problem was that I could never manage to reproduce your problem. 2.37.6 saves and loads absolutely perfectly for me. I do it all the time with absolutely no problems.
For some reason I have had a lot of trouble reproducing the errors that you reported while we were debugging 2.37.6. In general I couldn't make any of them fail and still haven't to this day.
As it stands right now I am unaware of any issues with 2.37.6 that would cause it to malfunction in any way. I understood that it was working for everybody now. (with the possible exception of Testlund)
--- End quote ---
Yeah, I remember that now. My memory had gotten a little rusty. But because of this problem it felt hopeless to use 2.37 and 2.4 was too buggy at that time, so I gave up on darwinbots. Then Eric came along starting to fixing the bugs in 2.42 wich got me interested again. So IMO DB 2.42 has surpassed 2.37. If I understand it correctly those fixes will be implemented in the C++ version PLUS new features.
As Shvarz mensioned it was confusing with the difference between these two versions. It took a little while before I understood they were very different from each other. Now I have learned to master my sims a little better in 2.42 and it works fine.
shvarz:
My favorite neo-darwinist is probably Theodore Dobzhansky. How about calling the program DobzhanskyBots?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version