Code center > Bugs and fixes
Why aren't you using 2.42?
Numsgil:
I had a notice up until about a week ago when 2.42 came out. No one seemed to read any of the little notes I have on the FTP
shvarz:
On a more serious note, I think DarwinBots 3 is a good well-descriptive name. DarwinBots 2006 is good as well, but it's more difficult to add numbers for updates to that (2006.2.12? Sounds like a date of release).
PurpleYouko:
--- Quote ---I don't have anything against 2.4 but I think we should inform newcomers of the issues. 2.37.6 might be easier to begin on? Also, one newcomer was trying to make a tiefeeder, and ties are notoriously unstable in 2.4.
--- End quote ---
The instructions are readily available and can be found in the "How do I get Darwinbots for myself" thread in the "What is DarwinBots?" forum
Here is a link to the threadhttp://www.darwinbots.com/Forum/index.php?...st=0#entry49485
I have just edited it very slightly. Most of it has been exactly this way for 6 months or more.
Obviously people aren't reading the introductory parts of the forum the way I expected them to.
Do we need to make it even more prominent?
EricL:
Trim the FTP Wiki. Provide downloads for only the latest 2.3X, 2.4X and C++ releases with a paragraph for each (and the version with the installer). Put all the rest on a "older releases" page one link away.
Elite:
--- Quote from: EricL ---Trim the FTP Wiki. Provide downloads for only the latest 2.3X, 2.4X and C++ releases with a paragraph for each (and the version with the installer). Put all the rest on a "older releases" page one link away.
--- End quote ---
Nice idea. Working on it ...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version