General > Biology
Crows are pretty damn smart
d-EVO:
Yes, totaly agree , thats why its called faith
bacillus:
True
Peter:
--- Quote from: bacillus ---No, but he didn't admit it either. He cleverly stayed on neutral ground.
The problem is that everyone thinks that science rejects the notion of god, but in reality, as there's not enough facts to say anything definite about the existence of god, it only says that the probability of there being one is not quite 100%.
--- End quote ---
Totally disagree.(sorry it is my nature, if everyone states it is right, I say it is wrong)
There aren't enough ''facts'' to prove the existance for gnomes, fairys, giants or god. That doesn't mean they exist. On the other side I would never dare to say gnomes don't exist. There isn't any prove they don't exist.
bacillus:
I'm not taking any sides, I just love to argue against whatever side is brought up first (or any side for that matter ). Did I say anything that might indicate a heavy bias? .
Anyway, pascal's wager: (From wikipedia)
Pascal's Wager (or Pascal's Gambit) is a suggestion posed by the French philosopher Blaise Pascal that even though the existence of God cannot be determined through reason, a person should "wager" as though God exists, because so living has potentially everything to gain, and certainly nothing to lose.
Okay, that is a good point, but not quite true unless you ignore extremes...
d-EVO:
--- Quote from: Peter ---Totally disagree.(sorry it is my nature, if everyone states it is right, I say it is wrong)
There aren't enough ''facts'' to prove the existance for gnomes, fairys, giants or god. That doesn't mean they exist. On the other side I would never dare to say gnomes don't exist. There isn't any prove they don't exist.
--- End quote ---
Actualy you are agreeing with us.
In case you were not following . we never actualy concluded the existance of god.
We concluded that the existance of god cannot be concluded through logic.
But I would rather be on the safe side and believe anyway and not argue with poeple that disagree
I will let them believe what they like if I can believe what I like.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version