Code center > Bugs and fixes
Why aren't you using 2.42?
Numsgil:
I'm with Elite on this one.
EricL:
Okey Dokey. 2.4 exhibits the opposite of what you recommend in both cases, which is in part (but only in part) why the gene Elite posted is not behaving as expected. But this is just the tip of the iceberg I fear....
Does anyone know what the 2.37.6 behaviour is? Elite, if your gene works on 2.37.6 then I assume that version behaves as you both indicate in both cases.
Elite:
Yep, in 2.37.6, .tmemloc is set until set again by the bot
However, the trefvars aren't automatically populated in 2.37.6, but making them so will be an improvement
EricL:
--- Quote from: Elite ---Yep, in 2.37.6, .tmemloc is set until set again by the bot
However, the trefvars aren't automatically populated in 2.37.6, but making them so will be an improvement
--- End quote ---
If the trefvars arn't populated automatically, then I don't understand how this gene works in that version. Maybe I'm slow today, but .tienum won't ever get set unless *.treffixed has a non-zero value. See this line in the gene
55 .tienum *.numties sgn mult *.treffixed mult store
Am I on drugs?
Numsgil:
--- Quote ---Am I on drugs?
--- End quote ---
If you're working on Darwinbots you have to be:
Hehehe. Hahaha.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version