Code center > Suggestions
What is wrong with Numgils new plasment control?
Botsareus:
--- Quote ---8 points of selection looks sloppy.
--- End quote ---
First time I use windows I thought it was the most redicules disorganized peace of crap I ever seen. But its comfort that counts.
--- Quote ---Mine doesn't wiggle when you drag it (or flicker, or whatever you want to call it).
--- End quote ---
Thats nice, mine is not supposed to do that eather.
--- Quote ---And I prefer dragging the existing box instead of creating a new one when you click outside the box.
--- End quote ---
I agree , if you never actualy use the robot plasment, there is no point of making it other then your own "preferable" way.
--- Quote ---It's all bounds checked when the control loses focus.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---D.) Very funny Num, Now you can draw the rectangle outside the limits of the screen.
--- End quote ---
Yes this is WAY better then my , your logic is undiniable.
--- Quote ---I don't know what you mean by C.
--- End quote ---
No "optional" keep in place "keep plasment", Girz does not care , I dont care.
(probebly still reporduces only the one veg from the list.)/RANT 'see my comments in code "aha gotea" one , stolen from my math teacher test results 53% one.
--- Quote ---And I can read this code and make sense of it
--- End quote ---
I can't read your code , or make sense of it at times... thank god its open source.
(were is the logic, num knew no vb he is just being a #%$%# thats were the logic is. Can't beat solid cr quitable logic.)
--- Quote ---A. ) No circler plasment
--- End quote ---
No answer. Yes Num likes his work , I bet. Who does not?
--- Quote ---B.) Using the "frame" instead of a "picture box" , bad look.
--- End quote ---
followed by a no answer followed by "looks sloppy" , unidniable logic, end of story.
Botsareus:
Tell me why I am still here...
Numsgil:
It's all going to be rewritten into C++ anyway, so I didn't want to spend alot of time on it. The new one for 2.4 is better than the old one, may or may not be better than yours. Either way it all gets rewritten.
Botsareus:
--- Quote ---It's all going to be rewritten into C++ anyway, so I didn't want to spend alot of time on it. The new one for 2.4 is better than the old one, may or may not be better than yours. Either way it all gets rewritten.
--- End quote ---
IT WAS EASYER FOR YOU TO ADD MY THEN MAKE YOUR OWN. thats were the logic horificaly brakes down so much, that offereing a solution to the argument without retaining to cosmic rift methods is higly impossible.
WHY DID NUM ADD HIS? HE DOES NOT GIVE A F&&& ABOUT MY WORK. I AM WASTING TYPE FOR 2 YEARS ALREADY AND I JUST FAIL TO SEE THIS.
--- Quote ---may or [you]may not [/you]be better than yours.
--- End quote ---
Below is provided how it is better then yours num, you still have to prove me wrong on it
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---8 points of selection looks sloppy.
--- End quote ---
First time I use windows I thought it was the most redicules disorganized peace of crap I ever seen. But its comfort that counts.
--- End quote ---
Num attempted an explonation that had nothing to do with the problem, I still don't buy it.
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---Mine doesn't wiggle when you drag it (or flicker, or whatever you want to call it).
--- End quote ---
Thats nice, mine is not supposed to do that eather.
--- End quote ---
Num attempted an explonation that had nothing to do with the problem, I still don't buy it.
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---And I prefer dragging the existing box instead of creating a new one when you click outside the box.
--- End quote ---
I agree , if you never actualy use the robot plasment, there is no point of making it other then your own "preferable" way.
--- End quote ---
Num attempted an explonation that had nothing to do with the problem, I still don't buy it.
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---It's all bounds checked when the control loses focus.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---D.) Very funny Num, Now you can draw the rectangle outside the limits of the screen.
--- End quote ---
Yes this is WAY better then my , your logic is undiniable.
--- End quote ---
Num attempted an explonation that had nothing to do with the problem, I still don't buy it.
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---I don't know what you mean by C.
--- End quote ---
No "optional" keep in place "keep plasment", Girz does not care , I dont care.
(probebly still reporduces only the one veg from the list.)/RANT 'see my comments in code "aha gotea" one , stolen from my math teacher test results 53% one.
--- End quote ---
Num attempted an explonation that had nothing to do with the problem, I still don't buy it.
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---And I can read this code and make sense of it
--- End quote ---
I can't read your code , or make sense of it at times... thank god its open source.
(were is the logic, num knew no vb he is just being a #%$%# thats were the logic is. Can't beat solid cr quitable logic.)
--- End quote ---
Num attempted an explonation that had nothing to do with the problem, I still don't buy it.
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---A. ) No circler plasment
--- End quote ---
No answer. Yes Num likes his work , I bet. Who does not?
--- End quote ---
Num attempted an explonation that had nothing to do with the problem, I still don't buy it.
--- Quote ---
--- Quote ---B.) Using the "frame" instead of a "picture box" , bad look.
--- End quote ---
followed by a no answer followed by "looks sloppy" , unidniable logic, end of story.
--- End quote ---
Num attempted an explonation that had nothing to do with the problem, I still don't buy it.
Botsareus:
Now now cruel world, tell me why I should be here, try to reasure me the way you reasure your "girlfrand" when you are cheating on your wife "that soon , soon I will leave my wife". After 3 times I asked for it it still did not get added.
BIG MISTAKE: MAKE THIS FOURM NOT THE SAME AS SONYS WERE I CANT USE QUOTES.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version