Code center > Suggestions

What is wrong with Numgils new plasment control?

(1/4) > >>

Botsareus:
A. ) No circler plasment

B.) Using the "frame" instead of a "picture box" , bad look.

C.) No "optional" keep in place "keep plasment", probebly still reporduces only the one veg from the list.

D.) Very funny Num, Now you can draw the rectangle outside the limits of the screen.

E.) only 4 point, not 8 point selection.

F.) Did I mention: No Drag-n-draw plasment?

Why I am doing this? simple, the logic above states that I will never code for DB again, do what ever you want from now on.

This world is not my frand. Num is the only one who will be getting a nobel for DB. Everyone else is just sheep.

Botsareus:
Yes Num , the plasment control you wrote from scrach is WAY better then mine. Thanks for your time too.

Botsareus:
Boing lost the compatition.... Skunk works won...

Botsareus:
So cruel world , tell me why I should still be here...

Numsgil:
Sarcasm aside, I like mine (minus the missing feature or two) better.

8 points of selection looks sloppy.

Mine doesn't wiggle when you drag it (or flicker, or whatever you want to call it).

And I prefer dragging the existing box instead of creating a new one when you click outside the box.

It's all bounds checked when the control loses focus.

I don't know what you mean by C.

And I can read this code and make sense of it ;)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page