I'm slow to change what I think is true/untrue. If someone could show me an overwhelming amount of evidence that magnetic fields alter the brain/body, I'd believe it.
In the mean time, I still say it's Horse Hooey.
understood ...
and it may very well be.
I'm only saying that the more certain one is of their 'beliefs' ...
the more preconceptions/assumptions one entertains ...
[be it in science or life in general]
the less open one will be to new possibilities ...
and the more one will miss/overlook.
that's just how it works.
there are many examples in science and the models we
considered to be absolutely 'true' at one time.
so I find it best to not call anything Horse Hooey ...'
and also to not take anything as gospel ...
to maintain a healthy skepticism ...
while remaining open to new possibilities.
it's a matter of finding a good balance.
as an aside ...
good scientific inquiry should consider 'Ockam's Razor' as well ...
the idea that if one is confronted with a choice of two equally valid
alternatives, to take the simpler' ... the reason being that humans
are prone to error ... and by taking the simpler alternative ...
one also reduces the chance of compounding errors ...
iow ... between two theories that can explain the same phenomena,
the theory with the fewest assumptions is to be preferred.
but hey ...
almost any inquiry is good and leads to something. ;)