General > Off Topic

Theoratical

<< < (3/3)

Botsareus:
ok... fine.

Numsgil:
Assuming you really hate it, the best solution is to just add a costs field for nrg/basepair/cycle, or soemthing like that.

Let evolution decide what's junk and what's not.

Your problem Bots is, as I keep saying, you keep trying to fix things that aren't necessarily broken.  Now, with all that isn't what it could be in the program, why not concentrate on areas that could be improved and make sense to do so?

[hint]Like graphs[/hint].  Or you could integrate the damn tie forces for me.  Ugh.

Botsareus:

--- Quote ---Or you could integrate the damn tie forces for me. Ugh.
--- End quote ---


[span style=\'font-size:14pt;line-height:100%\']ok how do you want swimming done?[/span] any others like swimming, gravity , combinations of fources = sounds like a fun challange.

[hint] graphs = too long to test , boaring as calcules if not more, c.) calcules = BOARING, still possible to evantualy get me to do it if my mood and the timing is right, good luck [/hint]

Numsgil:
I'll post it this afternoon.  It's actually an interesting problem.  Just damn near impossible.  Ugh.

:ph43r:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page