There isn't a need to worry. The article from the science advisory board website + my interview establish notability. Notability isn't temporary, so since it won that deletion concern it is immune forever in to the future. Anyone can propose an article for deletion, but assuming wiki goes by the rules it will never be deleted because of the previously failed deletion nomination. The problem here is that
Marasmusine has taken Darwinbots as his personal project. He's the one who nominated the page for deletion a few months ago. He's taken to blasting most of the ALife pages. He removed all my unsourced statements from the page, which made it appear too short, which got someone else to propose it for deletion, because that's how things work on wiki. The problem is the lack of sourcing.
What it needs is for someone to go over the article and source things. Find things from our wiki or our forum, and add it either as a proper reference or just add the urls in the references section. It's entirely valid to add pages to our wiki just to use them as references. I'd do it but I've been really busy of late.