Code center > Suggestions

Bringing back .sexrepro

<< < (4/6) > >>

Welwordion:
Inserting viruses at any point sounds comfortable for me, but I am worried how current antivirus genes are affected by this?

Oh and thx for your efforts .

Peter:

--- Quote from: Welwordion ---Inserting viruses at any point sounds comfortable for me, but I am worried how current antivirus genes are affected by this?

Oh and thx for your efforts .
--- End quote ---
Well, atleast they where supposed to do, they did in earlier versions, else antiviris is somewhat easy to make, if more then number of genes, delete last gene. I know light made a antivirus bot to delete virus if they came anywhere in the genome, it is named furiae.

Numsgil:
Right, back in the day when this was working properly, anti virus was very difficult because you had to check every gene in the genome to see if it was the virus in order to delete it.  I would push it a step further and have viruses get inserted anywhere in the genome, including in junk areas and inside other genes.  Opens up some other problems, though.

Botsareus:
More on viruses:


--- Quote ---virus_start blablabla virus_end 50
--- End quote ---

the 50 means the percentage of were aproximatly in the targets code the virus in inserted.

Botsareus:
Most of this stuff has been rewised so I might as well start a new post. I however have some qustions before I continue...

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page