Code center > Suggestions

Bringing back .sexrepro

<< < (6/6)

Botsareus:
That does not solve the problem: I can easly change my % number on where in the opponents dna it is to be inserted to work as a gene number. I will  however make sure a virus is inserted as its own gene, not part of a gene.

Botsareus:
I am procrastinating the posting as much as possible because I might be home in about 5 weeks, then I can get some more room to work: Like typeing everything into a notepad file and posting it in one shot.
For now let me tell you the new commands , I will explain them later...

r_m 'restore memory
sex_cromazone
male_sex_repro_start
female_sex_repro_start
sex_repro_start
sex_repro_end
d_s 'dna start
d_e 'dna end
p_m 'prerseve memory
a_c_s 'action command start
a_c_e 'action command end

Botsareus:

--- Quote ---Other than the issues I have with using a crossover command  (I think the whole methodology is overly complicated and can be done in a far more robust manner without using any new commands
--- End quote ---

I can imagine what Numsgil thinks of my system, I might as well quit without posting it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page