Code center > Suggestions
Emergent Systems
Numsgil:
I didn't decide on 1000 sysvars, it wasn't even my idea.
I only got here 10 months ago.
I just try to make as many things as possible backwards compatible.
I don't think the "problem" is the memory locations. I think the "problem" is impatient people.
Numsgil:
I may be dismissing ideas out of hand at the moment instead of evaluating them based purely on worth...
Perhaps suggesting changes in a more amiable manner might help :bash: (not you Ulc, sorry if I seemed a bit rough... point still stands I think though)
If the problem is in bots having trouble pinpointing the one number in 64000 that produces a result, what if we expand sysvars to a range?
Like 1 to 32 is .up, etc. etc.
Greven:
--- Quote ---I didn't decide on 1000 sysvars, it wasn't even my idea.
I only got here 10 months ago.
--- End quote ---
And here it goes again... Your one and only excuse! :puke:
Funny that you think it was meant as a sort of insult or something!
I KNOW you didnt design it, but you seem extremely eager to keep it that way it is.
Why not making the bots them self decide how many memoryslots they have, and which of them do what (difficult I know, but not impossible, and could add something to DB)
--- Quote ---I just try to make as many things as possible backwards compatible.
--- End quote ---
Actually if I remember right I havent seen a single post whining about this problem.
--- Quote ---I don't think the "problem" is the memory locations. I think the "problem" is impatient people.
--- End quote ---
Well I presume that the "problem" is me! :unsure: Well I did start my own project up, yes I think I did so, didnt I????
But well I still hope to influence the future of DB. Well you needed programmers Num, the "problem" is that you sometimes talk above peoples head, and are arrogant. I am a heck of a programmer in VB, Java, C++, SML you name it. I have from time to time tried to say I could help, but I never got any useful answers from you. It seems to me that you are the uncrowned king of programming DB, after all, why make it more difficult for your self and not add Bots code after all. It hard to read and decipher? Ask him to make it more readable, and to comment it, well I dont know. I havent tried bots code myself, or any of the newer versions, I will let that be until there exists a stable version, and when some of the major stuff get in.
Well, happy bug hunting!
:evil:
Numsgil:
I do try to keep things backwards compatible. And when I don't I repent and make them backwards comaptible anyway ;)
Yes, I like memory slots being used to determine action. It's a pattern that works, and I don't see why we should change it.
Greven:
--- Quote ---I may be dismissing ideas out of hand at the moment instead of evaluating them based purely on worth...
Perhaps suggesting changes in a more amiable manner might help :bash: (not you Ulc, sorry if I seemed a bit rough... point still stands I think though)
--- End quote ---
Really I dont know what you have against me, but maybe beginning to treat specific people as equal members of this board, might be helping!
We are here for DB, not insulting each other, and dismissing ideas because I don not write the proper is utterly stupid, and a sign of ignorance!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version