General > Biology

The Geek LoopHole

(1/6) > >>

Botsareus:
Any one wana contribute to solving:



Remember we need "better" robots not "worse" robots. The above are Not better robots.

Natural solutions ,and Artifisial solutions are all considered as always. If we can get Artifisial solutions that match natural solutions of real life I say we got it done.

(Right now I am thinking of trying my lest resort smexe method on it. As Num will say: Involves a lot of ugly coding in many places.)

Numsgil:
Define "better".  I've had evo sims evolve lots of things I didn't think were "better", but you got to reason that they must be, or why else would they evolev at all?

Botsareus:
Better means "can kik endestors ass in F1 mode"

Numsgil:
I don't think you can evolve such a thing reliably.  As I've said before and will say again, a simulation that's 0 cycles old and 5000000 cycles old are quite different.  The energy levels are different, the sysvars read back different values, etc.

And thing is, you really need a larger population size to evolve things with, and F1 settings don't allow that.

Botsareus:
Come one guys , the Nuke problem was not so hard , this one is doable to.

Btw: Thanks for all your help Num, Payback is sweet eh?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page