Bots and Simulations > Internet Mode Commentary
Who else is online?
Botsareus:
Well I got pissed of that people where hacking me trough IM. I was gone for a while. I may show up later with a zerobot into survival mode result.
It is just sad that once again IM did not really ever properly worked.
spike43884:
--- Quote from: Botsareus on April 08, 2015, 02:56:00 PM ---Well I got pissed of that people where hacking me trough IM. I was gone for a while. I may show up later with a zerobot into survival mode result.
It is just sad that once again IM did not really ever properly worked.
--- End quote ---
It was inefficient completely, you should join the DB3 discussions though, I've got some points on there like with IM...Nums and peter are teaming up to state how we should go wide and not tall with it (wide = lots of computers, tall = few servers)
Botsareus:
I am going to give IM one more try. I have 4 ideas that may work
One of them is to make a simple up-down server instead of PeterIM v2 with restrictions. I think it is ok for slower simulations to transfer out of sink with faster simulations. If anything I instructed Peter do delete robots randomly if server is at capacity.
Also the simple up-down server just like in the most successful peterIM uses a simple stack architecture. The latest robots on the server are always distributed first.
spike43884:
--- Quote from: Botsareus on April 09, 2015, 04:21:20 PM ---I am going to give IM one more try. I have 4 ideas that may work
One of them is to make a simple up-down server instead of PeterIM v2 with restrictions. I think it is ok for slower simulations to transfer out of sink with faster simulations. If anything I instructed Peter do delete robots randomly if server is at capacity.
Also the simple up-down server just like in the most successful peterIM uses a simple stack architecture. The latest robots on the server are always distributed first.
--- End quote ---
Can you adjust ports used? I hate PeterIM because of the ports its using so far, which reduces compatibility :/
Also, is the simulation going to run on participating pc's or a central server (Im wanting central server ;3).
Just as a sidenote if you do do an update to change IM, coudl you also include a little change to maybe 10 free memory locations to store longterm memory that remains for maybe 20 cycles unless overwritten? It'd be incredibly useful if I were to attempt an "All For One" bot
Botsareus:
The port thing is something to bring up with Peter, as I am the first to admit I do not know python or Internet programming well enough to know what I am doing. But I see you guys are having too much fun messing with Numsgils matrix painting transformations so I do not expect a complete fix anytime soon. Especially because I am asking Peter to revert 33% of his code.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version