Bots and Simulations > Bot Tavern
My weird A_Praxidikae
Botsareus:
--- Quote ---Great start Unc. It's not often that a newbie come in and stuffs the top bots.
--- End quote ---
I must agree with PY on that one. Good Job.
Don't be changing the bestury too mutch because I wont know were to post my bots. (I do, I do post bots sometimes :)
Endy:
Nice bot :)
Funny story about Prax and Canth, even during routine tournaments, evolution turns up.
Just out of curiosity does the .51 work correctly? I thought it had to be just a number... :unsure:
Not sure anymore what works and doesn't, Nums made the dna way more lenient than it was back in the day :D
Numsgil:
Pretty sure it still needs to be .label and (no dot) number, but someone write up a test bot and let's find out.
PurpleYouko:
dot number (.67) would be kind of pointless since the presence of a dot at the left of a DNA entry just lets the parser know that the following string is a label.
.67 would logically return zero since no label by the name of 67 exists.
Light:
--- Quote ---
--- Quote --- It's about time you grabbed that top slot back. It's lonely up there on top of the league. :lol:
--- End quote ---
Everytime I come out with a top bot, everyone else decides that they want to make a bot too :lol:
I think I've held it for a total of maybe 2 weeks.
--- End quote ---
well when you go and create such damn good bots its a great challenge to try and beat it :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version