sry, did not have time to make an outline

[PurpleYouko]

3.) I know I am not from Englend and my english is bad but come on.

Actually, your spellings brighten an otherwise dreary day. Every now and then you just come up with a real gem that is impossible to ignore.  :D

By biggest problem though is that sometimes I just can't understand what you are talking about. I can get around the spellings. It is the general meanings that I get stuck on.

[Botsareus]

Should not mess up any of the robots  because robots are writtin in text.

I havent seen a programer write .aimdx .up store when he ment 5 .up store.

Anyway I see the point about making junk transform into something workable.

Just can imagine now the huge gap between the evolution in db. And the user bot programing in db.

The evolved bots follow a completly different languge, I dont even care if you dont add any new commands to mutation. I want this hude gap to stay now or else the program will be to complex.

[Botsareus]

PY, its just I was leaving the lest two years the idea that problems of the real world do not invade syberspace...

[PurpleYouko]

I havent seen a programer write .aimdx .up store when he ment 5 .up store.

No?

Well what about this from Kozm0's Bodysnatcher..

cond
*.numties 0 >
start
*.tiepres .tienum store
.tieval .tieloc store
1000 .tieval store
stop

or this from my own Carnatus Orbis..

cond
*.robage 0 =
start
.shoot .ploc store
2000 60 store
200 61 store
.tie inc
*.myeye .refeye store
.tienum .vloc store
999 .venval store
stop

I would go so far as to say that you will would be hard pushed to find a single F1 bot that doesn't do this kind of thing a some point in its DNA.

[PurpleYouko]

The evolved bots follow a completly different languge, I dont even care if you dont add any new commands to mutation.

I wouldn't expect anything else. Why is this a problem?
Ever checked out neural networks? They never end up doing stuff the same way that a programmer would.

[Botsareus]

and whats the use of doing this?

[Numsgil]

and whats the use of doing this?

What's the use of not doing this?  Why do you feel the need to make bots evolve the way you want them to?

[PurpleYouko]

and whats the use of doing this?

Doing what pray tell.
Once again, what are you talking about. Please enlighten me.

[Botsareus]

cond
*.numties 0 >
start
*.tiepres .tienum store
.tieval .tieloc store
1000 .tieval store
stop

can be well writtin as

cond
*.numties 0 >
start
*.tiepres .tienum store
453 .tieloc store
1000 .tieval store
stop

am I missing somthing here?

[PurpleYouko]

am I missing somthing here?

No you aren't and that is exactly my point.
If we change the parser code then they won't be equivalent any more. Therefore those genes won't work any more.
Or are you suggesting that we still allow the code to be written that way but that when the program displays the DNA in the information window, that it just displays numbers instead.

 The labels are only there to make the DNA easier to read. They actually don't serve any purpose whatsoever
[sacasm]Hey why don't we just scrap labels altogether and just use memory addresses. Since they are exactly equivalent wouldn't this make things easier?[/sarcasm]

[Botsareus]

well its easy to use .aimdx instead of 5 for some people ok fine.

no problem there.

makes me wonder why no one uses this softwere.


In first grade they need to teach

.sx + .sx = .aimdx

logic is flowless...

[PurpleYouko]

In first grade they need to teach

.sx + .sx = .aimdx

logic is flowless...

Sweet  :D

Don't forget to add

.aim / .aimsx = .sx

[Botsareus]

ROFL

[Numsgil]

Don't forget to add

.aim / .aimsx = .sx

Already did.  Did I forget to mention that too?