This topic seems really interesting! The last few day I have thought about my DNA system, and found it rather dull!!?? :ph43r: :sleep:
And I understand what Num and Carlo are saying! So it is totally fine that it will be dropped/forgotten etc....
Regarding Carlo's proposal about writing the limits the sysvar can have into the sysvar file, is a stroke of genius!!!! :clap: :clap: ;) B) :P B) :P ;) B) :P ;) :lol: :bigginangel: :boing: :boing: :boing: :boing:
But how are we going to implement it? I can think of a few ways to do that:
If the number is bigger or lower than the limits:
- We can use the limits.
Example: limit 0-100, number = 204, then it will be scaled down to 100 etc. - Start over with the limits: (ie. making them circular)
Example: limit 0-100, number = 101, then number will be 0, if it is 200 it will be 100 etc. - Or it could be a different version of number 2, counting up/down:
Example: limit 0-100, number 101, the number will then be 99, at 200 it will be 0, at 201 it will be 1 etc.
I am for no. 2 or 3, (mostly 3). In this way the numbers can be mutating like hell, but we still get usefull DNA/genes whatever.
About making a one gene cycle, I see the point, but I dont think it will be super to do it. It will make survival much more random that it is now, and I think the old topic Num started about non-linear gene execution is better.... But I am open for new a excting ideas. :clap: