Code center > Suggestions
Make position a Single, not a Long
Botsareus:
--- Quote ---They don't know their (x,y) coordinates nor should they.
--- End quote ---
Like hell they do.
Ok lets make it simple: Why do modern cars need GPS ?
The only way we can apply the word "global" here is if we look at the edges of the screen that kinda worp space for our little robots.
Example 2:
After we get the egrid really going we can have somthing like the locas butterfly that always returns to the same forest during its mating seson even if it was born somewere else.
Botsareus:
I want to some day build a bot some day that uses stratagy in groups and a good understanding of the whole world (map) it is in to win. I will probebly need trig in order to do that.
Trig will be usefull anyway bc it will allow more complex figting stratagys in a bot.
And If you wana talk about realism: real cells do not "think" the way darwinbots do, they form into groups if neurons and then they "think". In the real worlds moleculer level you wont find a cell like "the one" But if Shvartz can tell me a linky or somthing of how thouse real deadly viruse cells "think" I will be glad to read. I am still sure its far more simpler stratagy wise then what darwinbots do already.
shvarz:
What is "think" Bots? Do computers think? Do dogs think? Do worms think? Do cells think?
But if we are talking about behaviour, even the simplest living cell has a behaviour that is much more complex than the behaviour of the most complex bot created so far.
Numsgil:
The xpos/ypos argument is so old. You can probably find it in the old forum.
I was thinking when I get the env grid up, we can have bots' locations be stored for what egrid cell they are in, instead of the uber-fine current twip locations. Each square is about as big as a bot, so I can't imagine needing to be more exact than that.
Speaking of when I get X working, I'm starting to program again! I have to find a summer jopb and earn X thousand dollars this summer for school, but other than that I have nothing to do. DB 2.37/2.4/3.0 here we come!
Botsareus:
Shvartz dont start me on this "think" crap , I get it enough from my shrink. I beleave we can make computers "think" one day , but thats just me.
--- Quote ---And If you wana talk about realism: real cells do not "think" the way darwinbots do, they form into groups if neurons and then they "think". In the real worlds moleculer level you wont find a cell like "the one" But if Shvartz can tell me a linky or somthing of how thouse real deadly viruse cells "think" I will be glad to read. I am still sure its far more simpler stratagy wise then what darwinbots do already.
--- End quote ---
Ok I see what you mean now. Ok If you cant call it thinking , if you can find a better word for it , use the better word.
Thats why I put it in "" marks...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version