General > Off Topic
Are u a creationist?
Shen:
Believing evolution and believing in God arnt mutually exclusive. Like PY said, obviously evolution happens, FACT. The only people who deny it are the kind of people who think the Earth is only 5,000 years old and cant accept that God might work in ways not described in the good book.
Whos to say God didnt drop his sandwich on Earth, forget about it for 4 billion years and come back to find it evolved into curious monkeys.
PurpleYouko:
I still think that we are all just 3 dimensional graphical images in a gigantinormous pan-super-fantasmico mega computer running the mother of all evolution sims.
The end is nigh!
Beware the time of the great hard drive crash
God's bed time comes a close second. He has to turn off the PC sooner or later. I just hope he has a really good save file hierarchy worked out.
Zelos:
persinal I dont belive in a god, its simply not possible for a god to exist by the laws of nature we have today.
Numsgil:
Ah, yes, God can[I/] exist by the laws of nature today.
Some could say that God is a Big Brother type alien society, who monitors Earth constantly and works tirelessly to manipulate humanity to a common goal (moral awareness, which would be imperitive for any species that would interact on the galactic stage. A species with technological ability but no morality could destroy a galactic patchwork civilization(s) based on mutual trust and open trade).
Or God could be a team of entertainment proffessionals who tape us for their candid camera tv show/website/magical into-your-brain machine, and who give us crazy commandments that go against our very nature because "it makes good TV."
Or God could be a higher dimensional being, able to watch all of 3D space simoltaneously without being seen.
Or God could be a super parallel processor computer, able to perform many actions simoltaneously, and able to monitor Earth through sophisticated bugging techniques.
Or He could even be what he says he is, a God, an immortal being of immense personal power and strong morality who also is able to multitask and observe all of everything simoltaneously, and who is, even today, still a bit beyond our comprehension.
Point is there isn't a single rule that exists that eliminates all possibilities of a God. Neither is there a rule that demands the existance of a God. The Laws of Nature are decidedly agnostic, which I believe is the only truly safe conclusion.
Greven:
Wow, I just wanted to make a bit of fun, and you all start to discuss it! :wacko:
But God could be anything, but with no proof, either direct nor indirect, it would be wrong to conclude God exist, there is no direct proof of evolution says the creationist, but with all AL software to prove them wrong.
AL is not life, but the software often optimizes to the egde of the rules in the simulation or co-evolve with the other creatures. Or has God a finger in this tooo?
Dont you think our mighty (evil?) (All-forgiving?) has other things to do, oh I did forget The Lord is Almighty, and can do/make etc. everything in the split of a nano-second.
I have no problem with people believing in God, I am actully not sure what I do, but I am a evolutionist troughout, but we need to understand that innovation and progress aint created by one-eyed people, like the medieval Europe and the now fundamentalist regimes of the Muslim society and Bush' religious supportes, "My idol is Jesus" or what ever he did say... (Hope you understand)!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version