Now imagine that I approched the real world the same way, that will give you a scare...
But as you don't seem to see, scientists approach the real world in exactly that way.
When you want to drasticly change the way something works, it is known a "paradigm shift". When you want to do this you had damn well better have a shed load of eveidence to back up your position.
Why is your way better than the existing way?
When has a similar approach been used successfully in a parallel field?
If you can satisfy this then perhaps your way will be tried out.