Code center > Dead-End and Solved Suggestion Requests

cns

<< < (2/3) > >>

Numsgil:
Have you tried something useful?  Like maybe a page on sqr or ^?  Or maybe a page on refvel functions?  Or even a page on .nrg and .body?

Zelos:
yeah, I started the energy page, virus, mb and sb. so what?

"...all of you ungranteful humans who took everything away from me, will feel my lost and dispare..."
from SA2B

Endy:
Hey man, if your feeling bored help out with what is already there and waiting. The pages you did on viruses, mbs sbs were good explainations, with pics and everything. If you'll provide the info I can spell/grammer check them for you.

Endy B)

Carlo:

--- Quote ---We could make a new kind of tie that we could use to connect all the bots to the same tie. That would fix the problem of communications, and making mega bots.
--- End quote ---
You people have a really strange idea of evolution. Instead of exploiting the rules of the universe to achieve new degrees of complexity, you ask god to change those rules. This is like cheating, and brings you nowhere.

Numsgil:
I agree with Carlo about a supertie of sorts.  That said, ties currently are somewhat difficult to work with.  I don't mean complex (that's good) I mean limited (that's bad).

When I get around to fixing ties (I have some good ideas) I'll try to find ways to allow communication between multiple ties in the same cycle.  That's the main problem in my book.

You have to lock onto a tie then wait a turn to access it.  If you could lock on, communicate, switch ties, communicate some more, all within the same cycle, I think that would make MBs much easier without really changing the rules.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page