Bots and Simulations > Tips and Tricks
NO MORE OVERFLOW
Botsareus:
--- Quote ---"mutating bot" will lose. ?????
--- End quote ---
No Shvartz , I am saying "mutating bot" will win , win win ;.....
Light:
Isn't generational turnover the average time it takes for one generation to die and another to take over, so for humans it would be like 70 or basically the lifespan of a bot. A high turnover would be a bot with a short lifespan
shvarz:
--- Quote ---No Shvartz , I am saying "mutating bot" will win , win win ;....
--- End quote ---
Then what is your problem then? I don't get it... If it works already, then why do you want to change something? :)
Seriosly though, you are saying that bot that changes mutation rates wins in your competition against a bot that does not change the mutation rates, right? And they both have mutation rates set by you...
I am saying that mutation rates that you set is probably too high, leading to accumulation of bad mutations. So when a bot can change it's mutation rates, then it will select for bots with lower mutation rates, become more stable and win. This is just a guess. I would be able to tell you more if you gave more details. A good test would be to take the bot that wins the competition and put it against the parental bots with mutations completely disabled. If it loses or is even with parent, then I am right. If it wins over the parent, then I am wrong and something else is going on.
Botsareus:
I just had this funny feeling... that changing the way 'mutation of mutation rates' works will make it even better, .... but I have my own Visual Basic for that.... I leave you guys alone, I need to test it myself first.
and sry for that c***BEEEP*****p yesturday, You alll....
Numsgil:
I would just like to take this opportunity to say that if you're going to swear, by all means swear. As long as you don't make it a habit, I don't mind.
What I do mind is ****beep*****. Drives me crazy. Just swear.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version