General > Off Topic

DarwinBot Awards

<< < (2/5) > >>

gymsum:
Then I suppose the most succesful bots fall under the category for the Ig-Darwin Awards. OK I like it.

bacillus:
"Ig Darwin Awards"?

Numsgil:
I think it's a reference to the Ig Nobel Prizes.

bacillus:
If you say so.
I saw a bot when running the league that might qualify (just):

cond
*.nrg 1 >=
*.myaimsx 1 !=
start
60 .repro store
stop

cond
*.eye5 30 >
*.refeye *.myeye !=
start
-1 .shoot store
stop

cond
*.eye5 29 <
*.vel 20 <
start
5 .up store
stop

cond
*.eye5 0 !=
*.refeye *.myeye =
start
1860 rnd .aimdx store
stop

cond
*.eye3 *.eye7 !=
*.eye1 *.eye9 != or
*.eye5 35 <
*.refeye *.myeye !=
start
*.eye3 *.eye1 add *.eye7 *.eye9 add sub 2 mult .aimsx store
stop

cond
*.nrg 1000 >=
start
60 .repro store
stop



cond
*.vtimer 0 =
start
1 .mkvirus store
stop

cond
*.vtimer 1 >
start
'donothing
stop

cond
*.vtimer 1 =
start
250 .vshoot store
stop

end

basically, whoever built this bot is relying on either mutations disabling the first gene or the virus killing everything in the first 38 cycles (the record survival time for this bot).

Take a bow, Simple Bot Virus, the only bot in the league to lose to Aura!

gymsum:
Heres one for the records, its not a veggie:


--- Code: ---cond
*.robage mod *.timer .repro store
*.robage mod *.timer .shootval store
-1 *.timer *.robage div mult .shoot store
stop
end
--- End code ---

I dont think you could find a worse candidate for a small time simulation because it doesnt do anything to survive, it just duplicates, not even moving to create a third or fourth one, perfect prey for your bot.

edited for your pleasure. Does not push 50 .repro every cycle, in fact he ratio of times not stored to times stored is logarythmic to time. and actually stores .repro based on time, which eventually should destroy the bot since its age will vary significantly each generation from the timer, pusing the values wrapped higher into infinity. call it the infinity destroyer. has a slight chance for successs because of mutations, other than that should be a complete failure. Ok, now with even more time-dependent changing values.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page