Ok, I looked it up, but anarcho-communism wasn't quite what I was thinking, because it means getting rid of private property. I can't answear for The venus Project as I've only looked at it a little, but supposedly they only mean that the natural resources should belong to everybody.
Well I pretty stuborn so don't blame me. But only the natural recources. Isn't that already true? Everybody has the sun, right. A gift-giving society where you can have property. I don't know the idea sounds less. There will still be people that have greed and find a way to own a halve city.
There's a balance between consumers and companies, people and government, uphold by the fact that people have some power to chose and have democratic power, but I see this balance is tipping over to the worse. Things have gone down hill quite much here in Sweden because people have gotten lazy and spoiled and don't care about protecting our unique democracy. We have this phenomenon here in Sweden where the left party is bringing the country down slowly while the right party is bringing it down fast. Every new generation of voters don't know that and make the mistake of voting for the right party (well there's actually several but it's always the same one that wins because they are allied. Look it up if you want to know more how it works) and finds it suddenly goes hell of a lot worse. Oops! Bring back the left! And then it goes back to the slow degrading again.
I am not entirely sure what it had to do with numsgil post.
Anyway, I gues your right and left is something else then it here is. I think the left-wing breaks the country and the right-wing fixes it.
If I look in the history of Dutch-politics it is rarely that there keep the same parties in control. Any party that is in control is always doing it wrong(or so the people think). That way coalitions and parties keep changing.
I don't vote left, becouse left always wants to put money in green-stuff. And becouse I know how much money 'nature' gets. A company that is filled with old-lefties gets three times as much money for an amount of land that they own(for rare grasses, yeah sure)
and rent to a farmer, from the goverment + rent-income from the respective farmer, as where a farmer has to work hard for on his land.
I don't vote that one serious right-party becouse they took subsidy-off the windmills and biogas-instalations. And want to wreck(and are wrecking) farmer-subsidy.
Last time I voted, I did vote a kindoff center-right party. More the least bad then the best, but it is always like that.