Bots and Simulations > DNA - General

Racial memory

<< < (2/3) > >>

AZPaul:
Thank you both.

FYI.  I only checked two locations (980, 981) but I did console check 4 newborns one cycle at a time from 0 thru 89. Mom's memory values did not transfer.

I've gotten around it, for now, letting the initial rnd function determine the value for the male tail length and female tail preference. I suppose I could communicate mom's values across the tie. I need to look at that.

Thanks, again.

Just off the wall: I like the name "junk DNA." This speaks volumes about us crazy H. Sapiens. We can't see the utility, if there is any, so we assume it has none and is thus junk. In humans there are lots of old bacteria and viral remnents in there, btw. I like, better, McFadden's view that it's leftover stuff from eons of development no longer used and may be "sleeping" awaiting the right chemical alarm clock. Gould speculated this could be the expansion ground of new features for some future H. Intellectulus. Some junk.

Enough.

Bye, y'all.

-P

Numsgil:

--- Quote ---Just off the wall: I like the name "junk DNA." This speaks volumes about us crazy H. Sapiens. We can't see the utility, if there is any, so we assume it has none and is thus junk. In humans there are lots of old bacteria and viral remnents in there, btw. I like, better, McFadden's view that it's leftover stuff from eons of development no longer used and may be "sleeping" awaiting the right chemical alarm clock. Gould speculated this could be the expansion ground of new features for some future H. Intellectulus. Some junk.
--- End quote ---
That's why I wanted to add it.  Junk DNA allows mutations to accumulate without effecting the phenotype immediatly.  Presumably the cost/benefit ratio of pruning DNA of Junk DNA is just too high, so cells don't really try.

Botsareus:
Try giving this guy a lot of energy on startup and check if all he’s children have different memory of 972 , if they do , there you go it’s a bug.

'Memory Location (972) Does not get transfeard , this is prove.
'sexrepro does not work , this is prove


--- Quote ---cond
  *.nrg
  6000
  >
start
1 1 rnd add
30
store
stop

cond
*31
10
!=
start
31 inc
stop

cond
  *31
  10
  =
  *972
  0
  =
start
1 30 rnd add
972
'later check if children have the same number as parants
store
stop

cond
  *30
  1
  =
start
  50
  .sexrepro
 'does not work
  store
  15
  .aimdx
  store
  0
  30
  store
stop
cond
  *30
  2
  =
start
  50
  .repro
 'reguler repro works , but if you replace this with sexrepro too...
  store
  15
  .aimdx
  store
  0
  30
  store
stop
end
--- End quote ---

More prove? Try my first bot , it has only 3 babys while it should have 7 babys when it reproduces.


--- Quote ---'/*****proper reproduction 1

cond
  *.nrg
  20000
  >
start
  50
  .repro
  store
  'if time to reproduce store it
  1
  972
  store
stop

cond
  '/after robot reproduces it reproduces more until energy less then 3000
  *972
  1
  =
start
  50
  .repro
  store
stop

cond
  *.nrg
  3000
  <
start
  0
  972
  store
stop

'\*****proper reproduction 1

cond
start
 -1
  .shoot
  store
  10
  .up
  store
stop
end
--- End quote ---

Numsgil:
I've never personally checked the code for racial memory, so it may be broken.  I'll look into it later.

Botsareus:
Ok , I just ran another simulation with firstbot, when its not a plant it seams to reproduce correctly, strange...

AzPaul , try making all your active-working robots not plants.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page