Code center > Suggestions
Simoltaneous DNA execution
Zelos:
ok, let us say we have 2 genes, 1 is bad (now) and 1 is good (now). the good 1 have the strenght 8 and the bad 2, if the bad sudenly is mutated to gain 9 it will cause the bot in question to die sooner then it should, coz its so bad. so the gene will keep its strenght down so its allways below the good one. but what if it all of a suddenly happen to be a good gene? then it will gain strenght while the toher, who are bad now, will get lower, both want to exist, so the bad one let the good 1 rule
Botsareus:
Ok people slow down , If we do this, How do you suppose math and loops are going to work in the new system? (I know there is no actual loops, I mean stuff like "every cycle count a++ memory(a) = 20 until a > 200")
Botsareus:
I think old robots should not lose there Functionality. There is just has to be a way for the Dna to be liner and non liner at the same time. I say we eather add new nonliner methods to the dna, or change the exsisting robots to use new liner methods in the dna.
--- Quote ---I think we'd have to include a 'run DNA linearly' button
--- End quote ---
A softwear must always be backwords compatible unless the old virsion is complete jibrish, but in this case its not , in 2.35 math is easyer to do then in what you prapose here.
Making a new "button" makes it no more backwords compatible
Numsgil:
That's the implications I'm talking about.
The stack wouldn't work between genes. It wouldn't affect any kind of counters you have going, though.
Any linearity between genes at all would ruin the system, so it'd have to be all or nothing.
--- Quote ---A softwear must always be backwords compatible unless the old virsion is complete jibrish, but in this case its not , in 2.35 math is easyer to do then in what you prapose here.
--- End quote ---
That's why I said:
--- Quote ---I think we'd have to include a 'run DNA linearly' button in the options menu so older bots could be run
--- End quote ---
Am I talking in a vacuum here?
Botsareus:
--- Quote ---Am I talking in a vacuum here?
--- End quote ---
I am starting to like repeating myself :P
--- Quote ---I think we'd have to include a 'run DNA linearly' button
--- End quote ---
A softwear must always be backwords compatible unless the old virsion is complete jibrish, but in this case its not , in 2.35 math is easyer to do then in what you prapose here.
Making a new "button" makes it no more backwords compatible
P.S.
The new qustion is How will NUm piss me off tuday? Endy and MP already did.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version