Code center > Suggestions

Simoltaneous DNA execution

<< < (4/8) > >>

Numsgil:
Backward compatible.

Note that the definition uses 'can read old files'.  Having older versions of bots and newer versions of bots interact works only if they don't interphere with the way the other works, and doesn't actually effect the backward compatible nature of the program.

That said, allowing a checkbox for each individual species in the startup options screen would work.  So you could run one species with linear DNA, and another without.

Botsareus:
If we have some robots on the screen with liner execution and nonliner in the same time, then there is no fear balance in the simulation. For example one will mutate easyer then the other one.

I posted my own solution to this problem already.

P.S.
I say we use my own definition of backwords compatible or forget about this new dna system. wana wote?

Btw+p.s. of p.s.

I think my definition is the correct definition , your link does not go agenst my definition in any way.

Numsgil:
Your definition is a subset of my definition.

That is, to use logic, your definition implies my definition, but the opposite is not true.  That is, my definition does not imply your definition.

AND WHAT THE HECK DO YOU MEAN WHEN YOU SAY 'FEAR'.  Seriously, I don't think you're using the right word.

Fear.

Last, for this to work at all the DNA for a bot has to be either ALL linear or ALL non linear.  Any mixing of the two defeats the purpose entirely.  The purpose is to 'free' the genes from the direct influence of each other.

Botsareus:
lol Num,  :banghead: Fair = fear back to the Twilight zone (cant spell)

I  MEAN [you]FAIR [/you] NUM

Numsgil:
OOhhhhhh....

Makes sense now.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page