General > Off Topic

Genesis, 2001, and Darwin

<< < (8/12) > >>

PurpleYouko:
They still died though  :P

 :lol:  PY  :lol:

Zelos:
ok, good you have a belief, but I didnt ask WHATS ure belief, I asked WHY does the god need to exist for you
BIG letter=not yell, just show you to look there

Numsgil:
But dying isn't so bad, if you believe there is an afterlife and better things to come.

So dying wasn't necessarily a punishment, just a natural consequence (I don't understand the mechanics of that).

Numsgil:

--- Quote ---ok, thats how tehy belive, but that doesnt explain why god is needed, and something cant be 200% so that tells against it self. but if you say that he was both son of god and god I can accept it, but not that he is 100% son and 100% god, not accepteble in mathematic
--- End quote ---
Your question was how could he be 100% god and 100% son.  So I explained that he's not.

The question "why does there need to be a god' is a pointless question indeed.  Either there is a God or there's not.  'need' doesn't enter anywhere in.

Zelos:
why make a machine that we dont need, why biuld a machine which can scratch my ass when I ahve a hand which do it just as good. if god doesnt need a creator, why would universe need it then?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version