Code center > Bugs and fixes
Why aren't you using 2.42?
EricL:
FYI, a related change I made was to change the code such that .tienum no longer gets set to 0 after using the tmemloc/tmemval combo. tieportcomm() in 2.4 was doing this. It seems to me that the proper behaviour should be that .tienum, like .tmemloc and .memloc should be sticky. Let me know if there are objections to this behavioural change.
EricL:
--- Quote from: Elite ---- The 'bot sight' feature that shows you what the eyes see is annoying, but at the same time useful. If only you could turn it on and off ...
--- End quote ---
FYI, I've added a new menu item on the Robot Options menu in 2.42.3 that allows you to turn this on and off.
EricL:
--- Quote from: Elite ---(3) .fixang, .fixlen and .tielen1-3 don't work
Sharing doesn't seem to work either
--- End quote ---
I am fairly confident that .fixang and .fixlen are now working as expected in 2.42.3. Sharing also appears to work at least in the runs I have done.
I am not sure about .tieang1-4 and .tielen1-4. Are these used or are they defunct? If anybody actively uses them, I would very much love a sample gene, preferably one which demostrates what doesn't work in 2.4... The wiki isn't very helpful about how they are supposed to work.
Numsgil:
PY added them relatively recently so he'd know for sure, but I think they're just variables that let you access ties directly instead of using tie ports.
Exactly similar to the other tie commands that handle length and angles, but it accesses the internal tie array directly (tie 1, tie 2, etc.).
PurpleYouko:
That pretty much sums it up Num.
Couldn't have put it better myself
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version