Code center > Bugs and fixes
Why aren't you using 2.42?
EricL:
--- Quote from: Numsgil ---I'm pretty certain that 2.37 also counts single cycles. The robot info page, however, displays age in 100s of cycles.
--- End quote ---
Right. I changed this in 2.42.2. The age sysvar works THE SAME in both versions. It counts single cycles and caps out at 32000. However, 2.42.2 and beyond now maintain an internal age counter that goes beyond 32000. It is this that is displayed in the robot properties dialog (in cycles, not 100's of cycles as it was previously) and is also used for a few other things such as the logrythmic per cycle aging cost calculation. That is, the logrythmic aging cost will continue to increase even after a bot reaches 32000 cycles of age. See #24 and #25 here.
Welwordion:
Sorry, somehow I always end up with finding the wrong reasons why certain genes do not work :/.
Numsgil:
That's alright, it keeps us on our toes.
EricL:
FYI, I have finished porting over the TieTorque() routine from 2.37.6 to 2.42.3. Elite's battery bot gene posted earlier in this discussion now runs correctly in 2.42.3. See #11 here.
Numsgil:
Yay!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version