Author Topic: Conditionless Bots  (Read 16748 times)

Offline Elite

  • Bot Overlord
  • ****
  • Posts: 532
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #30 on: January 24, 2006, 01:41:14 PM »
Thanks for that clarification. I was a little confused :rolleyes: . I suppose you would never really need to put 32000 into .dn (unless you wanted to die  :evil: )
« Last Edit: January 24, 2006, 01:44:06 PM by Elite »

Offline Light

  • Bot Destroyer
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #31 on: January 24, 2006, 02:05:16 PM »
Quote
Try making a bot that moves forward at a rate of 32000 every cycle.
funny cause when I did that they lost 11363 energy a cycle  :blink:

Offline Numsgil

  • Administrator
  • Bot God
  • *****
  • Posts: 7742
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #32 on: January 24, 2006, 03:09:15 PM »
Maybe we should double check that energy consumption function ;)

Offline Elite

  • Bot Overlord
  • ****
  • Posts: 532
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #33 on: January 24, 2006, 04:58:54 PM »
Quote
when I did that they lost 11363 energy a cycle

:huh: When I did it the bots lost over 20362 energy per cycle  :o

I am using version 2.37.6 by the way

Which version are you using Light?
« Last Edit: January 24, 2006, 05:00:42 PM by Elite »

Offline Light

  • Bot Destroyer
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #34 on: January 24, 2006, 07:02:35 PM »
yeah I was using 2.36.7, in 2.4a everything seems fine

Offline Endy

  • Bot Overlord
  • ****
  • Posts: 852
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #35 on: January 24, 2006, 10:27:36 PM »
Man I hate Duty Days. <_<  I come back and a topic has exploded :wacko:  B)

Maybe the above has something to do with the backwards acceleration :unsure:

Quote
I've looked at SGing DIN but I find the navigation codes confusing

Why Din never became SG -_- The navigation is something PY thought up that allows makes use of the stack to store only a single turn value per cycle; saving nrg. Unfortunatly it also makes it difficult to SGize. I've gotten most of the rest of the code converted but those genes are the stumbling block.

I've honestly gotten away from combat bots lately, maybe with new challengers I'll get back in the game :)
« Last Edit: January 25, 2006, 02:24:15 AM by Endy »

Offline PurpleYouko

  • Bot God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #36 on: January 25, 2006, 09:23:25 AM »
Quote
When I did it the bots lost over 20362 energy per cycle

Hmmm!!!!  :blink:

This is not good. I thought I had plugged that loophole.

Let's just say that it shouldn't happen that way. I will fix that as soon as I get a bit of spare time.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world
Those who understand binary.
and those who don't

:D PY :D

Offline Old Henk

  • Bot Destroyer
  • ***
  • Posts: 229
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #37 on: January 25, 2006, 10:06:47 AM »
Quote
I've honestly gotten away from combat bots lately, maybe with new challengers I'll get back in the game :)
I think you have :) I just ran the SB league and UNA came out on top  :)  :rolleyes:

Offline Elite

  • Bot Overlord
  • ****
  • Posts: 532
    • View Profile
Conditionless Bots
« Reply #38 on: January 25, 2006, 01:17:25 PM »
Yey  :)