Code center > Suggestions

C++ code

<< < (2/2)

Sprotiel:
I've started a design document on the wiki. Please comment and modify.

Endy:
I was kind of thinking 2.37 might be kept around as a testing platform for new stuff. With all the de-bugging done we should at least use it until C++ DB comes out.

Numsgil:
2.37 is sort of the standard until I get 2.4 (or rather the port) to have at least every feature 2.37 has.

Sprotiel:

--- Quote ---2.37 is sort of the standard until I get 2.4 (or rather the port) to have at least every feature 2.37 has.
--- End quote ---
The standard on which the port is built is 2.4, not 2.37. Which makes me think that we need a name for the C++ port. What about calling the future fully functional version 3.0?

Numsgil:
I'm thinking 3.0 should be whichever version implements metabolism and specialization and the rest of that fun stuff.

C++ version could be 2.5

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page